Page 1 of 1
Lens Comparison Canon 55-250 IS v EF 70-300 IS USM
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 7:47 pm
by benji1867
Hi guys, im looking at the Canon 55-250 IS and the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM. Whats the main benefits of the larger lens bar the extra distance? quality wise.
cheers
Ben
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 1:15 pm
by blackkettle
Hi
They're both excellent lenses and,to some extent,the wider 55mm of the one is more useful than the extra 50mm at the other end,because you can crop on computer but can't squeeze something too large in in the first place.
They're both in the budget end of the range(s) but the 55-250 is largely plastic construction and lightweight,whereas the considerably more costly 70-300IS is of much more robust and heavier construction.Both are optically rather good in this price bracket.
Barry
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 10:42 pm
by benji1867
Thanks very much, does anyone have any experience with the Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG MACRO?
Thx again
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 3:22 pm
by beefsteak
benji1867 wrote:Thanks very much, does anyone have any experience with the Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG MACRO?
Thx again
I've got one sat in front of right now !! I've just got it off of ebay for a good price , it seems ok but the weather ain't condusive with going out doors for some practice shots !! (It's widdling it down here!!)
I'll take some later if it picks up and post them later for you.
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 3:42 pm
by benji1867
I also hav purchased on of these of eBay, out of interest and if you don't mind me asking, what price did you score it at? Mine was £110
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:47 pm
by 2.2DME
Hi Ben
I use the Canon EF70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM that you mention in your post. It is a very good lens & an excellent starting point for a telephoto lens. The second lens that you mention is to my knowledge 2 models below this & results follow accordingly. Here's a couple of my shots with the lens to let you in see it "in action". Theres a load more on my flickr account
The one point I would make about this lens is that it suffers in the last 50mm, but then again any lens at this price-point will do the same!
G-EZFY by
QSY on-route, on Flickr
G-FBII by
QSY on-route, on Flickr
G-NWEM by
QSY on-route, on Flickr
G-FVEL (Fort Vale) by
QSY on-route, on Flickr
Anything else I can help about let me know

Don't forget that the camera is only as good as the lens that's on the front of it!
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:28 pm
by benji1867
Tar Stephen,
I would have preferred the Canon 70-300 but the budget will only stretch so far. I'll see how I get on with the sigma and well see. I'm off down London way for Obamas departure on the 26th so I'll upload a few as well as some on FC as well
Ben
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 3:35 pm
by 2.2DME
Hi Ben
I know exactly the feeling! I managed to get a good deal on my lens, otherwise it would also have been out of my price range

I'll look forward to seeing your pictures!
Cheers

Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 6:33 pm
by benji1867
Well don't be expecting too much, I'll have only had the camera 3 days before I set off. Either way, wish me luck.
Ben
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:49 am
by beefsteak
Sorry to upset you but I got it for 50 quid plus P+P !! I couldn't resist !!
Re: Lens Comparison
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:12 pm
by benji1867
Nah I can't blame you, that's a good price and id have done the same, if the circumstances had been swapped

I can't complain, I was happywith £110.
Ben