Tally-ho wrote:I don't see the "off centre" in the pictures.
And yes, sometimes there is a case to be made for allowing space and room for the 'plane to fly into'. Looking at some of these photo websites, you know these dedicated photo websites where your photo needs to pass a screening process by 'Screeners', I do sometimes wonder how closely cropped and photoshopped to death images make the grade.
Then again, photography is a broad church and there's room for all. The boredom of looking at all squeaky clean and laboratory perfect shots is to be avoided.
thanks for more feedback, they are a bit off centre and intentionally so, here are 3 screenshots of them as cropped with the grid overlaid (which I always do) to show the variation in spacing between the front and rear ends of the aircraft, I don't have a massive difference. I do tend to use the fuselage ends as the basis of the spacing rather than tailplanes etc as having equal space around the latter does tend to unbalance the photo (in my opinion at least). The LH MD.11 in particular has produced the reverse effect a bit though probably because the engine pod and tail are rather meaty items - one reason why the 'tripods' look so impressive I suppose.
Anyway there's a topic to discuss, any more feedback most welcome - I'm all for discussing and learning!
jap 747 grid by
Andrew Goldsmith, on Flickr
LH MD.11 grid by
Andrew Goldsmith, on Flickr
RYR 737 grid by
Andrew Goldsmith, on Flickr